SITTIN' HIND TITSLESIN!!!!?????????

SO THERE POINTER WAS WINGING HIS WAY BACK FROM AN AWESOME TIME IN THE WINDY CITY (& BOY WERE MY PAWS TIRED!)AFTER A NIGHT OF CHI TOWN BLUES AT LEGENDS (RECOMMENDED BY LOUISIANA RED HIMSELF!) ,MASTERPIECES AT THE ART INSTITUTE-THE PUPS GOT TICKETS TO TUT AND LOVED THAT DEAD DAWG'S OLE BONES - MILLENIUM DAWG PARK WITH FOUNTAINS GALORE , A SHINING TITANIUM DAWG BONE AND A FRANK GEHRY DESIGNED CONCERT VENUE FROM OUTER SPACE! THERE ON THE PLANE POINTER LOOKS UP FROM HIS FANATICAL READING OF NYTIMES,NYK'ER AND SPIES A WHITE SNOWCAP IN THE SEAT IN FRONT OF HIM. CATCH THE CLUES: A MAROON GOLF SHIRT, GLASSES, NEUROTIC CHEWING AND SHIFTING IN THE SEAT, A DEEP BASS VOICE BRAGGING TO SOME SAD SACK IN THE SEAT BESIDE IT, A FLIGHT COMING FROM ITS DEN OF ORIGIN AND HEADED TO HIS LATEST LAIR . TELL ME ANY TITSLESIN HUNTER WOULD NOT SUSPECT THAT THIS WAS THE VERY BEAST ITSELF...SO THE PLOTS BEGIN TO BE HATCHED...ONE OF POINTER'S PUPS VOLUNTEERS TO TRIP AND SPILL HOT TEA ON THE CREATURE, POINTER'S LIFELOVE WANTS TO BEGIN CHATTING IN STAGE WHISPER ABOUT THE STUDENT WALKOUT AND FACULTY STRIKE SECRETLY PLANNED TO PROTEST murmur...murmurr...pointer hisdawg self debates among cold shoulders , confrontation and mock forgiveness...JUST THEN THE PLANE LANDS AND THE CREATURE RISES ONTO ITS HAUNCHES ...IT REARS ITS UGLY HEAD AND TO EVERYDAWGS SURPRISE IT IS JUST SOME POOR SOUL BUSINESS DAWG WHO NARROWLY ESCAPED THIRD DEGREE BURNS FROM THE CLAN VENGEANCE OF THE POINTER SONS. ONCE AGAIN THE EVIL MAGIC OF THE TITSLESIN ESCAPES ITS JUST DESSERTS... ONE DAY, THE POINTERCLAN VOWS, WE'LL GET ITS HIDE!

REDFORD DAWG SPEAKS OUT ON MMYYYYYYYY BLOGGGGGGG1111111

Dear Friend,
With the U.S. Senate heading for a showdown vote on the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge, I wish I could sit down with you and explain just how much is at stake
in this fight for America's greatest birthing ground for wolves, caribou and
polar bears.
Since I can't do that, I've done the next best thing and recorded a short video
message about the critical situation at hand.
After watching the video, I hope you'll be moved to speak out in defense of the
Arctic Refuge by sending a message from our website to your two U.S. Senators.
Click here to view the video and send a message to your Senators:
http://www.nrdcactionfund.org/redfordarctic/action.asp?step=2&item=52387
We've got no time to lose.
President Bush and Congressional leaders are exploiting rising gas prices to
rush through legislation that would industrialize the Refuge for the sake of oil
company profits.
They're doing their damnedest to convince Americans that sacrificing our
nation's premiere wildlife sanctuary will solve our problems at the gas pump.
It's a lie. The Bush Administration's own Energy Department says that drilling
in the Arctic Refuge will save consumers only one penny per gallon at the pump
-- and that's 20 years from now!
Meanwhile, the oil companies would stuff their already bloated coffers with
billions more in profits. The oil companies win, everyone else loses.
The House of Representatives has already voted to turn the Arctic Refuge over to
the oil companies. And a version of this Arctic wildlife destruction bill is
heading for a make-or-break vote in the U.S. Senate. Please raise your voice in
opposition right now.
http://www.nrdcactionfund.org/redfordarctic/action.asp?step=2&item=52387
Tell your Senators you will not surrender America's greatest wildlife refuge to
save one penny at the pump. Tell them to get to work on kicking our nation's oil
habit by promoting renewable energy and better fuel economy for our gas-guzzling
cars.
Thank you for joining with me to keep America's Arctic wild and free!
Sincerely,
Robert Redford
NRDC Action Fund___________Reggie Marra15 Orchard HeightsNew Milford, CT 06776-3018860-354-9186 / www.integraljourneys.com

REDAWG OBJECTS...........

REDAWG RESENTS THE LADY OF THE HOUSE'S RACIST JOKE.EVERY GOOD REDAWG KNOWS THAT ANY REDAWG DOES NOT SCREAM WHEN MISTAKEN SADDLE HORN IS GRASPED.WE ARE SO TIRED OF THE ASSOCIATION OF WILD SCREAMING WITH THE AMERICAN REDAWG. THOSE OLD WESTERN MOVIES HAVE NOTHING BUT REDAWG YELPING. PLEASE GET IT STRAIGHT ONCE AND FOR ALL...WE MOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!

LADY OF THE HOUSE ALWAYS GETS A RISE OUT OF US........

INDIANS DON'T USE SADDLES > > A New Yorker was driving through a remote part of Arizona when her car > broke down. > > An American Indian on horseback came along and offered to give her a > ride to a nearby town. > She climbed up behind him on the horse and they rode off. The ride was > uneventful, except that every few minutes the Indian would let > out a "Ye-e-e-e-h-a-a-a-a" so loud it echoed off the surrounding hills. > > When they arrived in town, the Indian let her off at the local service > station, yelled one final "Ye-e-e-e-h-a-a -a-a!" and rode off. > > A service station attendant asked the woman what she did to get the Indian > so excited and she said, "Nothing, I just sat behind him, put my arms around > his waist and held onto the saddle horn, so I wouldn't fall off." > > "Lady," the attendant said, "Indians don't use saddles." > > > >

AQUINAS ROLLS OVER.....

THOMAS AQUINAS EQUATED THE ORDINATION OF WOMEN TO THE BAPTISM OF MONKEYS...WELL MEMBERSHIP IN THE ONE HOLY ROAMIN' CATHOLIC CHURCH IS AT SUCH A NEW LOW THAT -YOU GUESSED IT - CANINE BAPTISM HAS BEEN PERMITTED! HOLD ON THERE LADIES ,YOUR TIME MAY COME SOON!!! BUT PADRE ,WATCH YOUR AIM ...SEEMS OUR NEWLY BAPTIZED POOCH GOT SHOT STRAIGHT IN THE EYE!!!!!!!!!

MR BROOM JUST BACK FROM BEANTOWN CLEAN SWEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HI ! I'M MR BROOM AND AS THEY SAY A NEW BROOM SWEEPS CLEAN AND THAT'S WHAT I DID IN BEANTOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40+ RUNS AND A FINAL GAME 5 HITTER !!!!!! 51/2 GAMES IN FIRST AND 6 IN THE LOSS COLUMN...SAD SUX CRY,CRY CRY CRY 96 TEARS...2096 SEE THE SUX BACK IN THE WS!!!

huddle you masses ,huddle!!!!!!!

http://huddlemasses.blogspot.com/

BITE'N BITES ON THE SADSUX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Red Sox lasted six weeks alone at the top of the list but it ended when August rolled around. The Sox now haven’t had sole possession of first since July 31st. as a MATTER OR IS IT AS A madder of fact they haven’t even had a taste since August 3! And with the way it looks they may not even see it again. Kevin Youkilis went 0 for 4 today! Bad luck maybe, but it definitely wasn’t good! Well from the gossip the Red Sox are digging a hole and trying to cover it up but it just keeps getting deeper! So GO YANKS111111111111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RDSUXPUP CRYS OVER SWEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FOOOOOOOUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWN IN THE LOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSS COLUMN!!!!!!!!!!! SWEPT IN A DOUBLE HEADER AT FENWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! SEE YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU IN 2080.....

BITIN MO" DEN U CNCHU MAKES PAPA POINTER PROUD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A article in the Classic Maureen Dowd, by Eric Lichtblau, President Bush predicted Friday that an appeals court would ultimately overturn a decision this week declaring his warrantless wiretapping program illegal, and he said that’’ those who herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live ‘’

My only question is what kind of president do we have!!!!! If you consider listening to other people’s conversations legal why would this be a FREE country!! What happened to privacy, or does that not apply to the government! Why don’t we put a microphone in the White House and see how he feels! I bet we could find out a lot of Government secrets nobody ever would have known; maybe he’s breaking the law. Well we’ll never know. But I guess with how whack this president has been, we all should have expected it.

AFGHANHOUNDDDDDDD SAYS :WE SUFFER 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.palestine-info.info/


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1394941590455913170&q=PALESTINIAN+INTIFADA&hl=en

CHAI-D WANTS US TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ISRAEL SUFFERS

war2_0005.wmv (9020.9 KB)

POINTER'S FORMER BOSS FOUND DEAD...DON'T BLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2322365&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

READ THIS STORY AND TELL ME IF IT DOESN'T REMIND YOU OF A RECENT FORMER BOSS THAT TRIED TO RIP OUT THE THROATS OF ALL WHO GOT IN ITS WAY!!!!!!!!!!!

WHO KNEW HE WAS A MUSICRITIC2?????!!!!!!!!!!

http://kriskristofferson.com/news/


http://www.neilyoung.com/lwwtoday/lwwvideospage.html___________

OLD MARRIED COUPLE DAWGS LAYS IT DOWN....

An elderly couple, Margaret and Bert , married 52 years. Bert always wanted a pair of authentic cowboy boots.>> >>

So seeing some on sale one day, he buys them, wears them home, walks in proudly.
He walks into the house and says to his wife:'Notice anything different about me?'
Margaret looks him over, 'Nope.'
Frustrated Bert storms off into the bathroom,undresses, and walks back into the room completely naked except for the boots.>> >> Again, he asks, a little louder this time, 'Notice anything different NOW?'?????>> >>>> >>Margaret looks up and says, ' Bert , what's different? It's hanging down today, it was hanging down yesterday,it'll be hanging down again tomorrow.'!>> >>>> >>>> >> Furious, Bert yells, ' AND DO YOU KNOW WHY IT'S>> >>HANGING DOWN, MARGARET ??????'>> >>>> >>'Nope', she replies.>> >>>> >>>> >> 'IT'S HANGING DOWN BECAUSE IT'S LOOKING AT MY NEW BOOTS!!!!!'>> >> To which Margaret replies...>> >>>> >> 'Shoulda bought a hat, Bert . Shoulda bought a>> >>goddam hat.'!!!!!

LIBERTY DAWG PREACH ONNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://huddlemasses.blogspot.com/2006/08/dhs-imprisons-huddled-masses.html



keep going!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!













http://huddlemasses.blogspot.com/2006/08/uk-used-legal-wiretaps-not-bushs.html#links

HERE'S WINE-E-RAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!

HERE'S WINE-E-RAMA WITH HIS AWESOME WINE & FOOD REVIEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WINE-E-RAMA JOINS THE BLOG!!!!!!!!!!

Wine-E-Rama: non un connoisseur, appena un cane quel ama il vino!
Greg Norman Estates Shiraz 2003
Served with a pork scaloppini topped with sage and proscuitto, this under $15 bottle of wine was stellar. Crisp and acid enough to contrast the sweetness of the lemon Vermouth sauce and just perfect on the palette, with a fruity finish for a nice compliment. I enjoyed this bottle well into a desert of chocolate truffles (Trader Joes’s). Zingy in the beginning with a smooth finish. I recommend pairing with steaks on the grill topped with a roasted garlic butter, or something else with a little zip.
Since this is the first addition of Wine-e-rama, I will tell you there will be no numerical ratings. They are overrated and ambiguous. Instead our rating system will be as follows. In comparison to a dog’s life this wine is as good as chasing a cat into traffic then peeing on a fire hydrant. Trust me, that’s pretty good.

Chapter 2 :Do you remember when T began his rule...

LOOK AT THIS SAD MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN TITSLESIN BEGAN HIS RULE? HE STARTED BY GIVING ORDERS TO EVERYONE AND THE WHOLE COMMUNITY WAS SILENCED BY HIS OPPRESSION . WHY DOES THAT HAPPEN? WHY DO INTELLIGENT DAWGS WHO KNOW A DICTATORIAL LEADER IS WRONG JUST SUBMIT AND BECOME SILENT ? THE OTHER MYSTERY IS WHY DID ONE DAWG INVITE A DISCUSSION OF THE NEW TYRANNICAL DOMINATION IN HIS DEPARTMENT AND THEN WRITE IN THE MINUTES OF HIS DEPARTMENT MEETING THAT T'S HEAVY HANDED STYLE OF LEADERSHIP WAS CAUSING TROUBLE(THERE'S THAT WORD AGAIN) IN THE COMMUNITY. THESE DEPARTMENT MINUTES WERE NEVER SENT TO T THE MOST HIGH BUT MYSTERIOUSLY HE FOUND OUT ABOUT THEM. (THEY WERE GIVEN TO A SAD DAWG WE'LL CALL "HUMPS" CAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE DOES TO ALL AND ANY SUPERIORS) AND SOMEHOW THEY WERE HANDED OVER TO TITSLESIN. OH DEAR BLOG READER HAD YOU BEEN AT THE MEETING WHERE OUR PARANOID POOCH BLASTED THE NAIVE IDEALIST WHO FOOLISHLY SPILLED THE BEANS THAT T THE TROUBLESOME WAS UP TO HIS OLD TRICKS. HAD YOU BEEN THERE , YOU WOULD HAVE WITNESSED THE STRANGEST OF REVERSALS AS THIS SICK PUP ENDED UP ASKING THE SPILLER OF THE BEANS FOR HELP. I KNOW YOU ARE POPULAR HERE ,SAID THE CRAZY CANINE, AND MAYBE YOU COULD BRING THE OTHERS TO MY SIDE. WELL THAT'S WHEN THE TRUE BELIEVER DID WHAT ALL TRUE BELIEVERS DO ,HE BELIEVED THAT JUST MAYBE HE COULD HELP EVEN THIS PSYCHO PUPPY . OF COURSE, HE REPLIED , AND THEN IT HAPPENED ...TITSLESIN REACHED OUT HIS MIGHTY PAWS AND EMBRACED AS ONLY A GIANT DAWG CAN THE POOR,TINY IDEALIST AND AS TRUE BELIEVERS ARE APT TO DO , THE FOOL JUST STOOD THERE AND RECEIVED THIS DAWGY HUG . IDEALIST OR NOT , HAVING YOUR FACE CRUSHED UP AGAINST THE TITS OF A MONSTROUS TROUBLE DAWG LIKE TITSLESIN WAS FAR BEYOND DISCONCERTING. IN FACT SHOULD YOU ASK HIM TO THIS DAY HE WOULD HAVE ELECTED A PAPER CUT ON BOTH HIS EYE BALLS IN PLACE OF THIS TITSLESIN EMBRACE.

CHAPTER ONE :WHEN TITSLESIN FIRST CAME TO TOWN

Remember when Titslesin first came to town? Few people knew that he was fleeing a California lynch mob from a whole passle of trouble our favorite trouble dawg caused out there. If not for unforeseen tragic events here ,he may have never made his momentous landing in our little burg . To save him from the hanging tree his guardian angel( yes, even trouble dawgs as useless as the big T have angels watching over them) shipped him off the some frozen frontier where like Supie he would have been a recluse in the frosty fortress of solitude . Perhaps the powers that be felt pity for the iceburgs and so when a void opened in our unlucky village T plopped his big belly down here. If it had been the summer we could speculate that he was headed for hell fire and just got misdelivered. But his winter appearance discourages such tempting etiology. Not even here a week , our big boy 's paranoia(see later chapters for the tales that explain the origins of the technicolor psychopathological nightmare coat our"Joseph" wears) bloomed in full force. Screaming at his many haunting apparitions like Lear playing MacBeth , Titslesin was heard to shout: You're not going to do to me what you did to__________! Most mentally ill folks inspire compassion in those who witness their ravings but not our pal since his rantings are almost always accompanied by the meanest of bullying behavior aimed often at the weakest and most defenseless. Reserve harsh judgment dear Blogreader, till your hair be raised and your blood be curdled by the legends of their desperate soul's childhood of abuse and violation. All one need witness is the insane marching strut of our troubled pup to know , something is very wrong. Goose stepping may be too mild a description of the manic heaving and steaming motion by which our gargantua throws himself about. Perhaps he is maniacally taking flight from the many vengeful throngs that have sought his life in return for the shambles and the ransacked ruins this beast has left in his wake. Our poor town held its collective breath as it began to dread Titslesin's next move...

TITSLESIN is coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HE'S A REALLY TALL DAWG WITH A WIDE BOTTOM WHOSE BEEN TROUBLE TO EVERYONE PRACTICALLY SINCE HE 'S BEEN BORN...YOU'LL LAUGH , YOU'LL CRY AY THE ZANY ADVENTURES OF TITSLESIN THE TROUBLE DOG...WATCH THIS SPACE FOR HIS CONTINUING SAGA...

Connie linguist extraordinaire licks the EUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!

As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy.The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.By the 4th yer peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v".During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a real sensibl riten styl.Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.If zis mad you smil, pleas pas on to oza pepl.


___________

RDSUXDAWG HOWLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AH KNOOW DEY SAAAY THAHT THE RED SUX AH LIKE DAYLIGHT SAVINGS ...THEY SPRING AHHEAD AHND FAHLL BEHIND BUT THE DEVOL RAHYS AHND THE ROYAHLS MUST BE REAHLLY GOOD TEAMS SINCE THEY KICKED AH AHSSES SO BAHD ...AH LOSING RECORD SINCE THE AHLL-STAHR BREAK...OOOH MYY!

CANiS MAJOR APPEARS IN THE BLOG SKY!!!!!!!!!

-->
-->



The sky overhead may look the same, but the universe has changed completely.
By VERLYN KLINKENBORG
Published: August 9, 2006
Verlyn Klinkenborg, an Editorial Board member, writes about agriculture, the environment and culture.
Additional Reading
Sky Tonight, from the publishers of Sky & Telescope and NightSky magazines.
Heavens-Above, a satellite observation Web site.
Astronomy Magazine.
A localizable star chart.
Web site showing the locations of supernovae.
A complete guide to the Messier catalog, a list of 110 objects once mistaken for comets that were properly identified and labeled by the 18th-century French astronomer Charles Messier.
A free star-watching program.
Los Angeles� Griffith Observatory�s Star Awards, a collection of links honored for promoting public awareness of astronomy.
A photographic atlas of the Milky Way.
The other night I took the dogs for a walk in the pasture. It was a cloudless evening with low humidity, a rare event in this damp, northeastern summer. I always look up at the stars when I�m outside in the dark, but all too often, even here in the country, they�re obscured by haze. Not that night. They shone with a brightness, a clarity I�d almost forgotten. Cassiopeia, Corona Borealis, Lyra, the red light of Arcturus in the west, the diffuse band of the Milky Way arching overhead�their presence was overwhelming. And yet, somehow, when the stars look close to earth it�s easier to imagine how far away they really are. It was a warm July night, but I could almost feel the chill of space.
I�ve been watching the stars for nearly half a century now. Not much has changed up there. The sky is a memory in itself. I stared at the rings of Saturn and the moons of Jupiter through a small telescope of my own when I was a boy in Iowa. I spent part of a summer watching meteors while I was helping my family build a house in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada and part of a winter star-gazing from the top of a mesa on the Hopi Reservation, where somehow the smell of cedar mingled with the light of the moon. The only thing that has changed in all that time�apart from a few new satellites crossing the sky�is the state of my knowledge.
* * *
The same could be said for the whole of humanity. Besides a supernova here and there or a comet fluttering past, the night sky visible to the naked eye has barely changed as long as our species has been looking at it, unlike the stories we use to describe what we see up there. In a metaphorical sense, each human culture, separate in time or place, has lived under a different celestial roof. The metaphors for the heavens have changed over time, but not nearly as much as what we know about the universe itself.
I say �we,� as in what �we� know. I really mean what �they� know�astronomers, mathematicians, astrophysicists, cosmologists. Unlike scientists, most of us tend to live easily, almost unknowingly among our assumptions�another word for our ignorance. But the business of science is to formally test assumptions, better known as hypotheses. You can feel the tension between these two ways of knowing in a few lines from the movie "Men In Black" The scene is the Manhattan waterfront. Will Smith is still in shock after his first encounter with aliens. Tommy Lee Jones says to him, �Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the earth was flat. And fifteen minutes ago you knew that people were alone on this planet. Imagine what you�ll know tomorrow.� Obviously, what everybody knows isn�t a very high standard of proof. And things that can be proven � matters of scientific fact � don�t always surface as common knowledge.
* * *
Every few years I go through a bout of cosmological reading, a reprise of what to me is now mostly a familiar story. In a way, it�s like re-reading Raymond Chandler or great chunks of Dickens. The plot comes back to me as I go, but with a new ending every time. I started in childhood with an oversized, illustrated book about the solar system, a place where everything was just as we would like to believe it might be, a cozy people living in a handmade cosmos. The last time I wandered off into the universe, literarily speaking, I found myself, a little confused, on the far shoals of M-theory and the various anthropic principles. I�m never sure what�s going to set me off. It could be a news item about a flyby of Saturn or a new photograph from the Hubble Space Telescope or even a walk with the dogs at night. But however it begins, it always turns into a desire to frame the small questions of life with the big question of existence itself.
Most books about cosmology for general readers begin by telling the story the way Tommy Lee Jones tells it in "Men in Black"�as the history of what we know. The authors walk you, step by step, through the sequence of astronomers who have taught us about the cosmos�Copernicus, Galileo and so on. What you learn about the nature of the universe in a history like that is less important, at first, than what you learn about the decay of dogma and improvements in scientific methodology and equipment.
There are good reasons for telling the story this way. You get a feel for the passion of discovery, and you confront one of the basic cosmological questions �"How do they know that?" But as the pages turn and the chronicle nears the present, the story changes. Suddenly, it�s no longer a history of the development of science, a book about the human capacity for learning. It turns into a book about the nature of the universe we actually live in. The night sky never looks quite the same again.
* * *
The last time I lost myself in a good book about cosmology, just a few months ago, I counted down, as always, from the past to the present�from Aristarchus to Einstein to Weinberg. Usually, the dates in the history of science seem abstract, almost equidistant in the past: 1543, 1632, 1905 � it�s all ancient history. But this time, for some reason, I found myself weighing the dates of various discoveries�the ones that define our present idea of the age and dimensions of the universe�against the time-scale of my own life and the lives around me. I tried to picture what the universe looked like � or rather what it was thought to look like � around the year my dad was born � 1926 �- or the year I was born � 1952.
It was like going the wrong way in one of those analogies meant to convey the immensity of time. You know the ones. �If the age of the earth is the distance from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Empire State Building , then mankind originated in the Garment District.� The current picture of the universe rests, of course, upon the ancientness of what we know�the long series of carefully tested assumptions that make each new accession of knowledge possible.
But I am overwhelmed by the recentness of what we know.
* * *
Take, for instance, a relatively fundamental set of facts, something "everybody knows." Earth belongs to the solar system, and the solar system, with the Sun at its center, belongs to a galaxy called the Milky Way, which is about 100,000 light years across. The Milky Way is one of perhaps a hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe, each one containing perhaps a hundred billion stars. But until 1925, many astronomers believed � on the available evidence � that the Milky Way contained the whole of the observable universe, and that our galaxy was thus the only galaxy. Astronomers had seen and catalogued plenty of galaxies � they were called nebulae in those days � but there was no way to know how far away they really were.
In 1923, working at the Mount Wilson Observatory, near Pasadena, Edwin Hubble discovered a Cepheid variable star in the nebula called Andromeda, the first ever found in a nebula. Thanks to Henrietta Leavitt�s research on these stars � which vary in brightness over a period of time, with a predictable ratio between the two � Hubble was able to calculate the distance to the Andromeda Galaxy, as we call it now. It was vastly more distant than anyone had guessed. By his calculations, Andromeda was 900,000 light years away � well outside the Milky Way. In a sense, Hubble had turned the universe inside out.
Hubble was wrong about one thing. Andromeda is the closest galaxy to us, but it is actually 2.5 million light years away, not 900,000. You can see it with the naked eye if you look just below and to the right of the constellation Cassiopeia on a very dark, clear night. It�s worth knowing, somehow, that in another 3 billion years Andromeda will collide with the Milky Way. Perhaps "violently intersift" is a better way of putting it.
* * *
To a casual naked-eye observer on Earth it makes no practical difference whether the universe is the size of the Milky Way or much, much bigger. In fact, it makes little difference whether we�re looking up at stars scattered across empty space or at an empyrean of concentric crystalline spheres. The night sky overhead would look the same.
Or would it? Actually, I don�t think so.
What we see when we look up into the darkness of a summer night isn�t just a pattern of pinpoint lights. We�re also looking up at the state of our knowledge and the contents of our imagination. Does our own galaxy encompass the whole observable universe? Or is it only one among a huge number of galaxies in a vastly larger universe? The difference is enormous. Both are theories. One was plausible before 1925. The other is now true. The revolution in imagining who we are, or rather where we are, is nearly Copernican.
In the years since, there have been many, many discoveries more astonishing than Hubble�s path-breaking calculation of Andromeda�s distance, including his discovery, several years later, that the universe is expanding. But measuring that Cepheid variable in Andromeda fascinates me. It�s tempting to construe its effect solely in human terms, to say, with a vainglorious sniff, that it diminishes the place of humans in the universe. Ah, well. There is no end to that. One of the central problems of cosmology all along has been getting a true sense of scale. The age of the universe, its size, its origin, whether it�s static or expanding or contracting � these things are all interrelated, and they all depend on being able to measure distance accurately out to the far reaches of the universe. The more we know, the smaller we humans seem to loom against the universal backdrop. Luckily, what matters isn�t how big or important we are. It�s how interesting the universe we live in is.
My maternal grandfather, who was born in the 1880�s, used to marvel at the fact that in his lifetime humans had gone from horse-drawn carriages to the moon. I like to think of it a different way. He was born about the time astronomers finally proved that the ether � the peculiar light-carrying substance through which all celestial bodies were supposed to move � does not exist. He was married around the publication of Einstein�s theory of general relativity. He died a few years after Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson found the lingering echo of the Big Bang with a radio telescope in New Jersey. I cannot imagine that my grandfather was aware of any of these discoveries. And yet within his lifetime, the dimensions of the universe increased by a factor I am not mathematician enough to work out. Call it ten to the plenty.
* * *
In 1931, Edwin Hubble concluded that the universe was 1.8 billion years old, a nonsensical number since geologists had already shown that the rocks on earth are nearly twice as old. (Recent knowledge in itself!) In 1952, the scale of distance was recalculated with greater accuracy, and suddenly the age of the universe doubled to 3.6 billion years, much older but still a problematic figure. In 1955, the universe aged another 1.9 billion years overnight, again thanks to a clearer understanding of the things that shine in the dark. In the past 80 years the universe has expanded faster and aged faster � in the minds of humans � than it is doing in actuality. The current age of the universe, as measured in 2003, is now 13.7 billion years, give or take 200 million. That is another way of saying that the distance to the edge of the observable universe is 13.7 billion light-years.
What astronomers are seeing when they look at a galaxy like Abell 1835 IR1916 � 13.2 billion light years away � is light (or radiation) that was emitted 13.2 billion years ago, light that is about 3 times older than the planet we live on. Imagine a galaxy just a little farther away, at the extreme edge of what astronomers can observe. Suppose that it emits light even as you�re reading this sentence. How far away will the edge of the observable universe be when that light reaches us? The answer is somewhere between 78 and 90 billion light years. In fact, we � that is, "they" � have no idea how much of our universe lies beyond the threshold of observability. There is even sober speculation that our universe is merely one of a possibly infinite series of universes, that we live in a multiverse. Oddly, one of the best arguments for the multiverse is the simple fact that we exist.
* * *
Science is mostly a tale of continuity. Scientists today are working within the same professional framework � the same idea about how they do what they do, what hypotheses are, what evidence is � as scientists a century ago. That is the strength of the endeavor. The change from one picture of the universe to another is incremental, based on work that obeys the self-regulating, international standards of the scientific enterprise. But I find myself marveling at its discontinuity, too. What has changed, of course, is the technologies available to scientists, which have exploded at a revolutionary pace. The result is that you don�t have to go far back in time before the best idea of what the universe looks like is very different from the idea we have now.
In 1920 there was one galaxy and now there are one hundred billion.
In 1955 the universe was 5.5 billion years old. Now it is believed to be two and a half times older � an estimate with a considerably higher degree of precision.
For many years, the Big Bang was a conceptual possibility, the logical implication of an expanding universe. (What happens when you run the film of an expanding universe backwards?) But in 1965, Penzias and Wilsonfound an evenly diffused radiation permeating the sky, with a temperature of 2.7 degrees Kelvin. They had discovered the Cosmic Microwave Background � residual radiation from the Big Bang.
The Cosmic Microwave Background has been measured again and again, most recently in 2003 by a satellite called the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, or WMAP, which occupies a stationary post 1.5 million kilometers from earth. Measurements from WMAP support a theory of inflation first proposed by Alan Guth in 1979 and since refined. It says � and the evidence confirms � that at an unimaginably short time after the Big Bang, the universe experienced an abrupt inflation, doubling in size over and over again until inflation stopped an unimaginably short instant later. The result is the relatively smooth and geometrically flat universe we find ourselves living in.
WMAP also suggests that the universe is made of 4 percent atoms (now called baryonic matter), 22 percent dark matter, and 74 percent dark energy. As an idea, dark matter first popped up in the 1930�s. Dark energy is the thought of the past few years. No one knows what either of them is, except that without them the behavior of the universe makes no sense. It�s worth remembering, too, that the modern idea of the atom � that is, the old-fashioned modern idea, well before quarks � only came together in 1932, when the neutron was discovered.
* * *
Someone, somewhere, is likely to be shouting, "Aha!" about now.
"You�re saying that our so-called scientific knowledge is only a projection of sorts and that there is no scientific truth, only relativistic assumptions � culturally created ideas � about the universe around us. Isn�t that what you�re saying?"
Thanks for asking. The answer is no. Science is a cultural enterprise, of course, like everything else humans do, and it sometimes suffers from characteristically human flaws. But the recentness � or, to put it another way, the evolution � of what we know about the universe around us doesn�t reveal the indeterminacy of science. It reveals the extraordinary intellectual and imaginative yields that a self-critical, self-evaluating, self-testing, experimental search for understanding can generate over time.
We know the universe to be a very different � and in every way more amazing � place than we did even a generation ago. We have no idea how much more surprising it will turn out to be in the years � not to mention the eons � ahead, should we manage to survive as a species that is able to do science. If what you want from life is a constant, fixed, unchanging truth, then the spate of fresh news from science can only seem bewildering. But the unchanging truths that people cling to in this inconstant world tend to rest on unexamined and untestable assumptions. At their best they are permanent ethical truths, which cannot be contradicted by the open-ended possibilities of scientific exploration. At their worst, they are mere dogma and deserve to be contradicted.
To me, the open-endedness of science isn�t its failing. It is its very beauty. Each answer is merely the prelude to the next question, and you never know when you�ll come upon an answer that forces you to rethink almost everything. This is as true in biology � itself overwhelmed by recent knowledge � as it is in cosmology. Yet many people can�t help hoping for a final set of answers. "So how old is it really � and how big is it really?" they ask about the universe, with an emphasis on "really." The fact that the answer depends on when you happen to ask it � 1931, 1955, 2003, today � seems to many people to imply that science has no answers worth giving.
But this is simply the bias inherent in living in the "now." Stated as a sentence, that bias goes like this: "We�re here now, so we expect some answers." Think about those analogies meant to convey the immensity of time. They always end in the present. Mankind emerges in the Garment District or at 11 seconds to midnight, and then what? The clock stops at the current time, as if the game is over. But there is no time limit on the questions science asks, and there is very little likelihood of a final set of answers. Humanity emerges, looks up at the stars, and soon there is a probe in space telling us that most of what exists is stuff we can�t identify. Who would want it any other way?
* * *
Thinking about the recentness of what we know is a way, I suppose, of thinking simultaneously about the strangeness of the past and the strangeness of the present � the reciprocal strangenesses that time brings about. I have a hard time trying to imagine the universe as it might have been in, say, 1920 � the whole of it packed into the Milky Way. But then I have an equally hard time imagining what it would have been like to be a hired hand on my grandfather�s farm in 1920. The changes in the way we live loom far larger in most of our minds than any changes in the theoretical model of a universe that most of us think about � if we think about it at all � only on a dark, clear night. But the changes go together.
I am at best the kind of cosmological reader who has to skip the math. As a result, my grasp on most of what astronomers have learned in my lifetime is largely esthetic. I admire the finished painting, but I have no real conception of what it means to apply the paint. And for me, in fact, the old forms of knowledge are hard enough. Not the ones rooted in dogma, but the ones rooted in a practical application of what astronomers have learned over the years. Understanding the motion of the moon through the sky is more complicated than it sounds, as I have discovered from trying to sort it out.
Knowing how and why the universe is expanding doesn�t change the rules of celestial navigation any more than it changes the stories people tell about the figures in the constellations. The recentness of what we know doesn�t annul the old knowledge; it transfigures it. Suddenly, what we used to know is now part of the story of how we go about knowing things and no longer a description of the universe around us. But go out on a deep summer night and there overhead are all the skies we have ever seen.
Lela Moore provided research for this article.





-->


















-->

my friend, the lady of the house, sends her proverbs ...

Virginity like bubble, one prick, all gone. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who run in front of car get tired. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who run behind car get exhausted. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man with hand in pocket feel cocky all day. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Foolish man give wife grand piano, wise man give wife upright organ. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who walk through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man with one chopstick go hungry. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who scratch ass should not bite fingernails. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who eat many prunes get good run for money. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Baseball is wrong: man with four balls cannot walk. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Panties not best thing on earth! But next to best thing on earth. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > War does not determine who is right, war determine who is left. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Wife who put husband in doghouse soon find him in cat house. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who fight with wife all day get no piece at night. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > It take many nails to build crib, but one screw to fill it. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who drive like hell, bound to get there. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who stand on toilet is high on pot. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who live in glass house should change clothes in basement. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who fish in other man's well often catch crabs. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Man who fart in church sit in own pew. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Crowded elevator smell different to midget. > > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > Now send it to 10 or more people. > > > Nothing will happen but 10 people laughing.

THEY KEEP COMING...............................

POINTER IS THERILLED THAT DAWG AFTER DAWG KEEP COMING OUT TO SPEAK THEIR PIECE !!!!!!!!!

HERE WE HAVE A COURAGEOUS GUARD DAWG SENDING US NEWS ABOUT SOME LOCAL CHICKEN HAWKS WHO WANT TO HURT THE BRAVEST AND THE BEST...DON'T SLEEP WELL TONIGHT KNOWING THAT FLAKE AND HUCKLEBERRY ARE TRYING TO CRIPPLE COPS--REMEMBER THEM ? COPS? THEY'RE THE FOLKS THAT PROTECT YOU FOR A LOT LESS MONEY THAN THE CHICKEN HAWKS STEAL FROM YOU......

http://azcops.org/newsletter/2006/newsletter_spring_summer_06.pdf

OUR BUDDY COMMANDS THE MASSES INTO A HUDDLE.....

http://huddlemasses.blogspot.com/2006/08/constitution-in-crisis.html

POINTER PRESENTS.................

CATIMAL PLANET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN THE FIRST EPISODE THE INFAMOUS FRENCH CAT NAMED CLAW-CLAW DEFIES THE FISH-EATING RULES OF FELINEHOOD AND RESCUES A FISH CAUGHT IN A FISHTANK CAVE . WITH BRAVERY BEYOND THE CATCALL OF DUTY SHE DOVE INTO THE TANK , SAWED OPEN THE ENTRAPPING CAVE WITH HER RAZOR LIKE CLAWS(THUS THE APPELATION) AND FREED THE ENSNARED CREATURE...RUMORS THAT SAID LIBERATED PRISONER SOON WAS SEEN IN A BEAUTIFUL BOUILLEBASE HAVE BEEN DISCOUNTED BY CLAW AND HER DINING COMPANIONS AS THEY LICKED THEIR LIPS...APPARENTLY THE FISH WAS ON VACATION AND THUS UNABLE TO COMMENT!
DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SHOW THIS GORGEOUS CAT TILL ANOTHER TIMENFAMOUR fRENCH CAT-CLAW-CLAWLANETPLANET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BYT' NMO DAN U CACHEW is havin' a BBBB-DAYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAPPY B_DAY DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

POINTER BECOMES AN ADVICE COLUMNIST??!!

So the letter arrives with this fetching image of a bitch(dawgtawk) calling herself who-lee-ahhhh!

Apparently she's big into cleanliness which is definitely not pointer's forte but as a K-9 -atarian never let it be said i refused a fellow dawg aid and assistance. So here's her letter followed by my answer:

Dear Pointer, After reading your blog I feel like I finally have some where to turn. You seem to be so cosmopolitan and erudite, a true dog-of-the -world. Maybe you can help me. I get so nervous sometimes and want to get everything perfect. As a result my husband and my kids but especially my husband drives me crazy!!!!! I do so want to relax and enjoy life but I feel like I just can't .Help! Who-lee-ahhhhh

Dear Who-lee-ah, The answer to your problems is to bring out the ahhhhhhhhhhh! in who-lee-ah. I have two words for you: INNER PUPPY! Let that inner little doggie free to wander and explore. Forget about getting everything right. Let them all be singing when Whooo-lllllleeeeee-ahhhhhhhhhhhh! struts her stuff : Whooooo llleeeeeeeeettttttttt the dawgs out!!!!

LUCK TO YOU LADY!!!!!!!!! POINTER

SAIL ON SILVER>>>

SILVER HAS A HANKERING FOR REVEALING THE TWO-FACEDNESS OF SOME OF POINTER"S FAVORITE FACES ON THE WALL OF SHAME:

http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/foulwell.htm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2g-CvIDi5_4


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Falwellhustler.jpg

Aaaaaand, covering his ass.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/14/Falwell.apology/
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/11/60minutes/main525316.shtml

Santorum has experienced undeniable karma.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=oHFJsy8XG9Q

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=santorum













-->



















-->

HUMANS RESPOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE UNFAIR RESPONSE BY DEMOCRATS,DAWGS AND EVEN BUNNY RABBITS TO HUMAN PROCREATIVE HABITS TRULY HURTS. WE ,CHRISTIAN YOUTH ARE DOING OUR PART IN THE BATTLE AGAINST RAMPANT HUMAN REPRODUCTION ...READ ON ,HARRY REID ,DUMBDAWGS AND EVEN DUMBER BUNNIES!!!!!!!

Many Teens Who Take 'Virginity Pledges' Substitute Other High-Risk Behavior for Intercourse, Study SaysMain Category: Sexual Health / STDs NewsArticle Date: 21 Mar 2005 - 21:00pm (PDT) email this article printer friendly view opinions


Although teenagers who take "virginity pledges" begin engaging in vaginal intercourse later than teens who have not committed to remain abstinent until marriage, they also are more likely to engage in oral or anal sex than nonpledging virgin teens and less likely to use condoms once they become sexually active, according to a study published in the April issue of the... Journal of Adolescent Health, the Washington Post reports. The findings could explain why pledgers have similar rates of sexually transmitted diseases as nonpledging teens (Connolly, Washington Post, 3/19). Study co-authors Peter Bearman, sociology department chair at Columbia University, and Hannah Bruckner of Yale University used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which is funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and CDC, the AP/Long Island Newsday reports. The national study surveyed students nationwide in grades seven through 12 and followed up with interviews one, two and six years later. The Yale and Columbia report looked at data from 12,000 teenagers (Apuzzo, AP/Long Island Newsday, 3/18).
STD Findings Bearman and Bruckner in March 2004 at the 2004 National STD Prevention Conference in Philadelphia presented their findings that teens who make abstinence pledges have similar rates of STDs as teens who have not made pledges. The study -- also based on data from the NLSAH -- found that, although teens who made the pledges had sexual intercourse an average of 18 months later than teens who did not take a pledge and averaged fewer sexual partners overall, they had similar rates of STDs. In addition, the study found that pledgers were much less likely to use contraception the first time they had sex and also were less likely than other teens to have undergone STD testing and know their STD status, which could increase their risk of STD transmission to sexual partners (Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, 3/10/04). Of the 777 teens who reported being virginity pledgers throughout the course of the study, 4.6% had trichomoniasis, chlamydia or gonorrhea. Of the 1,622 who reported pledge to remain abstinent at some point during the study, 6.4% had one of the STDs. Of the 9,072 teens who did not ever make a virginity pledge, 6.9% had one of the STDs (Wetzstein, Washington Times, 3/19). The study did not reveal significant geographical differences but did show that minorities were "far more likely" to have an STD, according to the Post. About 25% of African-American girls had at least one STD in 2002, the study found (Washington Post, 3/19).
Details Because pledgers typically delayed sexual activity, had fewer sexual partners and married earlier than nonpledgers, the researchers "looked for explanations" as to why the differences in STD rates were not statistically significant, Bearman said, the Times reports (Washington Times, 3/19). The gap between pledgers and nonpledgers for high-risk behavior was statistically significant, with 2% of virgins who did not pledge reporting engaging in anal or oral sex, compared with 13% of those who did pledge (Washington Post, 3/19). According to Bruckner, the pledgers' increased likelihood of substituting oral or anal sex for vaginal intercourse puts them at risk of contracting STDs, according to Bruckner. Among virgins, boys who had pledged abstinence were four times as likely to have engaged in anal sex as those who did not pledge, and pledgers overall were six times as likely to have engaged in oral sex as teens who were virgins but did not take a pledge, the study found. In addition, teens who made virginity pledges were less likely to use condoms during their first sexual experience and were less likely to get tested for STDs, the study found (Detroit Free Press, 3/19).
Conclusions "Advocates for abstinence-only education assert that premarital abstinence and post-marital sex are necessary and sufficient for avoiding negative consequences of sexual activity, such as STDs," the study says, adding, "This assertion collides with the realities of adolescents' and young adults' lives." As a result, abstinence-only education is insufficient to prevent teens from contracting STDs, Bruckner said, according to the Toronto Globe and Mail. "It can't be enough because eventually, even the most abstinent adolescents, the great majority of them will have sex. ... We need to provide education that helps in dealing with it when they do it," Bruckner said (Mahoney, Globe and Mail, 3/19). "The sad story is that kids who are trying to preserve their technical virginity are, in some cases, engaging in much riskier behavior," Bearman said, adding, "From a public health point of view, an abstinence movement that encourages no vaginal sex may inadvertently encourage other forms of alternative sex that are at higher risk of STDs" (Washington Post, 3/19).
Reaction "Not only do virginity pledges not work to keep our young people safe, they are causing harm by undermining condom use, contraception and medical treatment," William Smith, policy director at the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, said (Washington Times, 3/19). Deborah Roffman, an educator and author, said that teens who take virginity pledges "are often undereducated about sexual health" and will engage in oral or anal sex because they do not consider it "real sex," according to the Post (Washington Post, 3/19). However, Leslee Unruh, president of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse, called the study "bogus" and said that the supposed pledgers had not pledged true abstinence, which forbids oral and anal sex (AP/Long Island Newsday, 3/18). Robert Rector, an analyst at the Heritage Institute, said that the study overlooked previous findings about teens who take virginity pledges -- including that they usually have fewer pregnancies and out-of-wedlock births -- adding that the programs are "hugely successful" in those areas (Washington Post, 3/19).
Chicago Tribune Examines Virginity Pledges The Chicago Tribune on Sunday examined virginity pledges and the recent "craze" of "purity rings" that many teenagers wear to proclaim their abstinence-until-marriage pledge. Despite the recent surge in purity rings and abstinence programs -- some of which receive federal funding under the Bush administration -- teen health experts say that most teens will break their pledges before they are married. In addition, these health experts also say there is no "reliable evidence" that the programs reduce teen pregnancy or the spread of STDs, according to the Tribune (Bario, Chicago Tribune, 3/20). The complete article is available online. "Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/reproThe Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
<>

RABBITREPLICATE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MULTIPLYING LIKE WHAT? LIKE RABBITS...OH THE HUMILIATION...AND FROM A FELLOW BEAST NO LESS ...FROM A HUMAN ,I COULD BEAR IT BUT A DAWG SHOULD KNOW BETTER...RABBITS ARE AS CHASTE AS ...AS...CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN ABSTINENCE ONLY YOUTH GROUP MEMBERS...SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!! YOU, DAWG ,YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHY CAN"T HUMANS PRACTICE SPAYING AND NEUTERING!!!!!!!!

DAWGS HAVE MANAGED TO CONTROL THEIR PROCREATION AND HUMANS ARE STILL MULTIPLYING LIKE ...SORRY ...RABBITS??!!!

reid-on-abortion-minority-leader-harry.url (0.1 KB)

STAMP OUT MISSPELLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JOIN ME ,PEDANDAWGTIC, IN MY CAMPAIGN AGAINST MISSPELLING-I DO NOT OPPOSE TORI OR AARON (ABONANOMA) MISSPELLING BUT WHAT REALLY GETS MY DEW CLAWS IN A TWIST IS MISSPELLING ON PUBLIC SIGNS. DID YOU SEE THIS EXAMPLE! TELL ME YOUR EMOTIONS ARE NOT STIPPPED DOWN TO THE SKIN AND THE BONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





nudistcolony.jpg (89.6 KB)

AND A HARDY HI! YOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! SILVA!!!!!!!!

SILVER WANTS YOU TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROGRESSIVE TRENDS IN THE WORLD OF AMERICAN PHILISTINISM:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060803/us_nm/robertson_dc


i ,YOUR PUP POINTER BELIEVES THAT gOD IS PREPARING OUR BOY ,PATTY , FOR THE HIGH TEMPS S/HE HAS PREPARED FOR THE DEVIL AND ALL HIS ANGELS...THIS SELF-STYLED MAN OF GOD HAS AN IMPRESSIVE RESUME OF LUDICROSITY AND ODIUM (HE HATES SO MUCH IS IT ODIA?), LET'S REVIEW: REMEMBER THE TIME RIGHTEOUS ROBBIE PRAYED A HURRICANE OFF THE COAST OF VA(IT'S FOR LOVERS) AND IT HIT LAND IN NJ AND KILLED HUNDREDS . HOW ABOUT THAT GOLDEN NUGGET ABOUT AIDS AS GOD'S SCOURGE. YOU MUST REMEMBER FONDLY 9-11 AS GOD'S PUNISHMENT FOR ABORTION , GAY LOVE AND MALLS OPEN ON SUNDAYS. EVEN KATRINA MANAGED TO BECOME AN ARROW IN THE SADISTIC QUIVER OF PATSY'S WAR GOD. FORGET ABOUT THE FOSSIL FUELS YOU SUPERSTITIOUS FOSSIL AND GET READY TO HAVE THE TRUE GOD OF JUSTICE BURN YOU ON YOUR HYPOCRITICAL ASS! CC: SANTORUM,GINGRICH,FALWELL, OH THE LIST GOES ON AND ON...

A NEW VOICE BARKS OUT ON POINTER'S BLOG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

full-page ad in the New York Times,

no MO' BU sh't !!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE RETURN OF NYYANKDAWG!!!!!!

A HAIKU

BY YAN KY FAN


ALONE

IN FIRST PLACE

HOW SWEET IT IS...

U 'memba Silva'?noh?

E' GOT A TAIL TO TELL 'BOUT AH BOY MAD MEL ...READ 'T N' SEE WHOT YA BE THINKIN'...

http://www.bonaroo.co.uk/product_info.php?products_id=138

PROTESTING BEARS STILL SHOW BARE-LIKE DISCRIMINATION!!!!!!!!!!!

EVEN WHEN BEARS UNITE SOME ARE STILL LEFT OUT!!!!! THIS IS A BOO-BOO THAT CANNOT BE FORGIVEN...RISE UP BEARS LEFT OUT...YES , THAT MEANS YOU - THREE BEARS STILL IN THERAPY FROM THAT GOLDEN-LOCKED CHICK AND MUSSOURSKY'S INSPIRATION BEAR HE MET ON THAT BALD MOUNTAIN...UNACKNOWLEDGED BEARS OF THE WORLD UNITE...YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT YOUR PAINS!!!!!!!!!!

just can"t bear it......

BEARS UNLIKE "BARES" (WHAT BEARS CALL HUMANS) WILL NOT STAND BY WHILE HOMELAND SECURITY OR ANY OTHER NAME FOR BIG BROTHER INVADES OUR CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT TO PRIVACY...IF YOU WANT TO WITNESS THE FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF OUR RIGHTS BY FASCIST BARES , LOG IN TO: HTTP://WWW.COM/WILDCAMGRIZZLIES

OR

HTTP://WWW.PRATTMUSEUM.ORG

In Memoriam ...27 years ago today...

TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS AGO TODAY BASEBALL AND THE YANKEES LOST A HERO... LET US REMEMBER HIM BY LIVING LIFE LARGE AND EXCELLING AT OUR OWN CRAFTS THROUGH TOUGHNESS, DEDICATION AND ENDURANCE...WINNING OR LOSING WE WILL SUIT UP AND CATCH EVERY INNING. LOOK OVER EVERY PITCH AND WHEN YOU CAN...HIT IT A MILE. LEAD THOSE AROUND YOU THROUGH EXAMPLE AND MAKE EVERY GAME A SYMBOL OF HOW THINGS SHOULD,MUST,BE DONE!

http://www.thebaseballpage.com/players/munsoth01.php

http://www.thurmanmunson.com/index.html

POINTER CAN GO>>>

POINTER CAN GO FROM THE TRIVIAL TO THE PROFOUND LIKE LIFE ... VEA UNA OFRESA DE MI AMIGO MAHEFAR:

dedicado_a_Rachel_Corrie.pps

POINTER AND ALL HIS YANKEE FAN FRIENDS SAY

SOMOS PRIMEROS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!